Real World Speed
Performance profile from 101,827 user samples
56,564 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 36% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 33% PowerColor(148C 2359)
Poor: 33% Great: 36%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 639
45,263 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% Sapphire(174B E285)
Worst Bench: 42% Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 42% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
35.1 % 45.5 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
127 fps 183 fps Much better lighting effects.
+44%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps 121 fps Faster multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps 165 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+32%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps 206 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+46%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
108 fps 129 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps 176 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+36%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps 148 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+11%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 Fps 80 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+21%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 Fps +2% 42 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 Fps +1% 130 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 Fps 87 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+16%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
51 Fps 65 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+29%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 Fps 45 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+7%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps 84 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+10%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+14%
43 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 Fps 80 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+30%
Market Share
Based on 28,815,730 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.2 % Much higher market share.
+33%
0.15 %
Value
Value For Money
61.6 % Hugely better value.
+128%
27 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % More popular.
+18%
84 %
Price
Price (score)
$135 Much cheaper.
+66%
$399
Age
Newest
60 Months More recent.
+25%
80 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
136 fps 160 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps 276 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+42%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
86 fps 180 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+109%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps 148 fps Better reflection handling.
+15%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
174 fps 249 fps Much better texture detail.
+43%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.4 fps 170 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+104%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback