Real World Speed
Performance profile from 92,348 user samples
50,852 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 31% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 31% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 625
41,496 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% XFX(1682 9462) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 18% MSI(1462 809D)
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 129th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
34.7 % Much faster effective speed.
21.3 %
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
173 fps Much better texture detail.
101 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps Much faster multi rendering.
63.3 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
76 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.3 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
77.4 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps Much better peak texture detail.
116 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
65.4 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
130 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
85.3 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.2 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
80.3 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
116 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
50 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
40 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
131 fps Better LoL Fps.
112 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
59 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
51 fps Better BF1 Fps.
43 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
32 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 97 fps +4%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
68 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
46 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.21 % 0.23 % Slightly higher market share.
Value For Money
60.9 % Better value.
48 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % More popular.
81 %
Price (score)
$135 $105 Cheaper.
53 Months 39 Months More recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
87.7 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
136 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
84 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
132 fps Much better lighting effects.
74.6 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps Much better reflection handling.
79.4 fps

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback