Real World Speed
Performance profile from 72,615 user samples
53,632 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 31% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 31% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 85th / 621
18,983 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 54% Gigabyte(1458 2311) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 54% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
34.9 % 61.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+76%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
175 fps 322 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+84%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps 158 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+50%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps 234 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+90%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.4 fps 146 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+75%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps 362 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+86%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
108 fps 165 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+53%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps 257 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+99%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.2 fps 151 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+69%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps 154 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+16%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66 fps 93 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+41%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
42 fps 70 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+64%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
131 fps 164 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+25%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 108 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 70 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+66%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 205 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+119%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 95 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+54%
Market Share
Based on 20,028,022 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.22 % 0.6 % Hugely higher market share.
+173%
Value
Value For Money
50.1 % 67.3 % Much better value.
+34%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 112 % Slightly more popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score)
$165 Cheaper.
+24%
$216
Age
Newest
51 Months 10 Months Hugely more recent.
+80%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps 256 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+82%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
136 fps 213 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+57%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
133 fps 229 fps Much better lighting effects.
+72%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
130 fps 203 fps Much better reflection handling.
+56%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback