Real World Speed
Performance profile from 100,145 user samples
50,852 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 31% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 31% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 625
49,293 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 869F)
Poor: 68% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
34.7 % 73.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+113%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
173 fps 274 fps Much better texture detail.
+58%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps 220 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+112%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps 264 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+115%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.3 fps 177 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+112%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps 301 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+55%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps 243 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+123%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
130 fps 280 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+115%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.2 fps 190 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+113%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 fps 160 fps Better CSGO Fps.
+20%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 fps 134 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+102%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 fps 75 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+78%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
131 fps 172 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+31%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 112 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+49%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 85 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+99%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 287 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+206%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 154 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+87%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
51 fps 99 fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+96%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 137 fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+120%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.21 % 1.43 % Hugely higher market share.
+581%
Value
Value For Money
60.9 % 67.3 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 139 % Much more popular.
+42%
Price
Price (score)
$135 Much cheaper.
+48%
$260
Age
Newest
53 Months 8 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps 322 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+128%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
136 fps 252 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+85%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
132 fps 299 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+127%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps 237 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+84%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback