Real World Speed
Performance profile from 224,125 user samples
59,243 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 39% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 32% Asus(1043 049A)
Poor: 32% Great: 39%
SPEED RANK: 104th / 650
164,882 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 69% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
36.3 % 78.6 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+117%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
44.8 fps 98.6 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+120%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
49.7 fps 104 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+109%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
41.1 fps 87.6 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+113%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
47.8 fps 107 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+124%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
51.8 fps 114 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+120%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
43.2 fps 93.8 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+117%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps 156 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+18%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 Fps 133 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+100%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 Fps 74 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+71%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 Fps 181 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+37%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 Fps 110 Fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+46%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
51 Fps 78 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+54%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 Fps 82 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+94%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps 263 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+188%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps 147 Fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+94%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 Fps 93 Fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+89%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 Fps 133 Fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+115%
Market Share
Based on 35,647,537 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.16 % 1.26 % Hugely higher market share.
+688%
Value
Value For Money
53.7 % 66.5 % Better value.
+24%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % 148 % Much more popular.
+53%
Price
Price (score)
$160 Much cheaper.
+43%
$280
Age
Newest
65 Months 21 Months Much more recent.
+68%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
52.2 fps 99.4 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+90%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
61.2 fps 95.6 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+56%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
37.4 fps 82.6 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+121%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
49.5 fps 90.8 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+83%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
54.4 fps 85 fps Much better texture detail.
+56%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
36 fps 74.8 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+108%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $144Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback