Real World Speed
Performance profile from 173,034 user samples
61,351 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 39% PowerColor(148C 2359)
Worst Bench: 32% Asus(1043 049A)
Poor: 32% Great: 39%
SPEED RANK: 104th / 650
111,683 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 65% Zotac(19DA 5543)
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
36.3 % 72.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+100%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
135 fps 280 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+107%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps 147 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+40%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
124 fps 233 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+88%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
144 fps 303 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+110%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps 160 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+47%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
130 fps 251 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+93%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps +3% 128 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 Fps 120 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+81%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 Fps 76 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+74%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 Fps 183 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+39%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 Fps 102 Fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+36%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 Fps 63 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+49%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps 306 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+235%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps 131 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+72%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 Fps 117 Fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+90%
Market Share
Based on 35,638,728 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.16 % 1.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+569%
Value
Value For Money
53.8 % 75 % Much better value.
+39%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % 138 % Much more popular.
+42%
Price
Price (score)
$160 Much cheaper.
+30%
$230
Age
Newest
65 Months 20 Months Much more recent.
+69%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
136 fps 235 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+73%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps 268 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+37%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
86.2 fps 183 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+112%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps 218 fps Much better reflection handling.
+69%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
174 fps 239 fps Much better texture detail.
+37%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
82.8 fps 166 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+100%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $144Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback