Real World Speed
Performance profile from 149,136 user samples
58,758 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 33% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 33% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 94th / 634
90,378 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 199% EVGA(3842 2484) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 199%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
35.1 % 169 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+381%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
128 fps 589 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+360%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps 508 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+384%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps 600 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+380%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps 718 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+409%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps 600 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+450%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
130 fps 714 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+449%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps 263 Fps Hugely Better CSGO Fps.
+98%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 Fps 197 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+198%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 Fps 140 Fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+222%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 Fps 278 Fps Hugely Better LoL Fps.
+111%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 Fps 139 Fps Hugely Better Overwatch Fps.
+85%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
51 Fps 147 Fps Hugely Better BF1 Fps.
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 Fps 173 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+308%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps 303 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+232%
Market Share
Based on 23,745,478 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.22 % 1.5 % Hugely higher market share.
+582%
Value
Value For Money
61.5 % Much better value.
+69%
36.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 107 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$135 Hugely cheaper.
+88%
$1,100
Age
Newest
55 Months 16 Months Much more recent.
+71%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
137 fps 637 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+365%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps 829 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+327%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88.2 fps 353 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+300%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps 537 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+316%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
175 fps 686 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+292%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.5 fps 304 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+264%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback