Real World Speed
Performance profile from 44,887 user samples
12,788 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 22C8)
Worst Bench: 38% Asus(1043 04F5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 38% Great: 53%
SPEED RANK: 76th / 621
32,099 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Worst Bench: 81% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 81% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
49.4 % 91.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+86%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps 271 fps Much better texture detail.
+40%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
107 fps 219 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+105%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
144 fps 262 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+82%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
86.1 fps 173 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+101%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
219 fps 302 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+38%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
112 fps 235 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+110%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
152 fps 280 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+84%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
93 fps 190 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+104%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
145 fps 160 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+10%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps 179 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+45%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65 fps 113 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+73%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
40 fps 89 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+122%
Market Share
Based on 19,261,975 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.07 % 1.41 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,914%
Value
Value For Money
47.5 % 80.5 % Much better value.
+69%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
74 % 86 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score)
$246 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
$270
Age
Newest
44 Months 5 Months Hugely more recent.
+89%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
160 fps 322 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+101%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
141 fps 254 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+80%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
144 fps 294 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+104%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
133 fps 235 fps Much better reflection handling.
+77%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback