Real World Speed
Performance profile from 204,177 user samples
82,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 45% PwrHis(1787 2358) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 131st / 714
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
49.7 % 56.9 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
64.1 fps 71.8 fps Better lighting effects.
+12%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
72.4 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+6%
68.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.6 fps 67.7 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
59.2 fps 81.4 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
68.9 fps 79.8 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
76.9 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
70.5 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.7 fps 71.3 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
61.9 fps 90.3 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+46%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps 174 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+11%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 Fps 96 Fps +3%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 Fps 67 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+23%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
45 Fps 67 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+48%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
173 Fps +2% 169 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
100 Fps 107 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+7%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
67 Fps 77 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 Fps 84 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+54%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps 195 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+46%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps 128 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+23%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps +4% 100 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,420,712 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.04 % 0.09 % Hugely higher market share.
+125%
Value
Value For Money
36.2 % 67.4 % Hugely better value.
+86%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % 77 % More popular.
+22%
Price
Price (score)
$325 $200 Much cheaper.
+38%
Age
Newest
106 Months 65 Months Much more recent.
+39%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
94.4 fps 111 fps Better peak texture detail.
+18%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
46.7 fps 54 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+16%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
86.6 fps 99.9 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
44.9 fps 52.7 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback