Real World Speed
Performance profile from 94,535 user samples
53,930 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 45% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 67th / 625
40,605 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 76% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 76% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.9 % 85.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+78%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
196 fps 289 fps Much better lighting effects.
+47%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
128 fps 182 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+42%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
174 fps 326 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+87%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
211 fps 351 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+66%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps 192 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+45%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps 368 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+104%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
159 fps +1% 157 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+34%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 91 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+67%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 76 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+64%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
172 fps 186 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+8%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
100 fps 125 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+25%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 101 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 86 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+56%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps 170 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+47%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 80 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+62%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 fps 129 fps Better WoT Fps.
+24%
Market Share
Based on 21,742,097 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.22 % 0.49 % Hugely higher market share.
+123%
Value
Value For Money
37.3 % 63 % Much better value.
+69%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
92 % 111 % More popular.
+21%
Price
Price (score)
$304 +5% $320
Age
Newest
53 Months 27 Months Much more recent.
+49%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
164 fps 239 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+46%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
286 fps 569 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+99%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
186 fps 302 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+62%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
157 fps 227 fps Much better reflection handling.
+45%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
260 fps 489 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+88%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
179 fps 287 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+60%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 becomes competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback