UserBenchmark: AMD R9 Fury-X vs Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

BUY • $781

Nvidia

BUY • $143

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 326,803 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

8,241 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 65% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 51% AMD(1002 0B36)

Poor: 51% Great: 65%

SPEED RANK: 113^th / 714

318,562 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)

Poor: 70% Great: 81%

SPEED RANK: 95^th / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		58.9 %			76 %	Faster effective speed. +29%


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	77.9 fps	96.9 fps	Better lighting effects. +24%
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	66.8 fps	98.8 fps	Much better reflection handling. +48%
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	61.2 fps	96.9 fps	Much faster multi rendering. +58%
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	88.1 fps	89.4 fps	+1%


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	87.6 fps		104 fps	Better peak lighting effects. +19%
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	71.7 fps		134 fps	Hugely better peak reflection handling. +87%
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	63.8 fps		103 fps	Much faster peak multi rendering. +61%
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	97.9 fps	+4%	93.8 fps


BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max		82 Fps	+5%		78 Fps

Market Share

Based on 67,424,279 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0 %	0.72 %	Insanely higher market share. +∞%
Value Value For Money	17.9 %	126 %	Hugely better value. +604%
User Rating UBM User Rating	62 %	82 %	Much more popular. +32%
Price Price (score)	$781	$143	Hugely cheaper. +82%


Age Newest	106 Months		61 Months	Much more recent. +42%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	133 fps	Much better peak texture detail. +39%	95.9 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	43 fps		80.1 fps	Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +86%
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	116 fps	Much better texture detail. +32%	87.6 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	41.7 fps		75.7 fps	Hugely faster complex splatting. +82%

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. ^{[Jun '15 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. ^{[Feb '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback