Real World Speed
Performance profile from 248,807 user samples
18,014 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Sapphire(174B E331)
Worst Bench: 53% Sapphire(174B E331)
Poor: 53% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 115th / 714
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
58.4 % 68.3 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
78.2 fps 90.3 fps Better lighting effects.
+15%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
67.1 fps 90.8 fps Much better reflection handling.
+35%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
61.1 fps 64.2 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+5%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
80.5 fps +3% 78.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
83.6 fps 97.1 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.9 fps 121 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+71%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.8 fps 68.5 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
86.9 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+5%
82.7 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
199 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+55%
128 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps +1% 76 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
212 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+16%
183 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
107 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+5%
102 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+10%
63 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,405,048 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.72 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
69.6 % 113 % Much better value.
+63%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
60 % 76 % More popular.
+27%
Price
Price (score)
$199 $143 Cheaper.
+28%
Age
Newest
105 Months 61 Months Much more recent.
+42%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+40%
84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
43.7 fps 74.6 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+71%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
109 fps Much better texture detail.
+44%
75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
41.7 fps 70 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+68%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback