Real World Speed
Performance profile from 92,348 user samples
41,496 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% XFX(1682 9462) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 18% MSI(1462 809D)
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 129th / 625
50,852 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 31% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 31% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
21.3 % 34.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+63%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps 173 fps Much better texture detail.
+71%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.3 fps 104 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+64%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
76 fps 123 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+62%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.4 fps 83.3 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
116 fps 194 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+67%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.4 fps 109 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+67%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
85.3 fps 130 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+52%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.3 fps 89.2 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+11%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
116 fps 133 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+15%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 66 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+33%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
40 fps 42 fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+6%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
112 fps 131 fps Better LoL Fps.
+17%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 fps 75 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+26%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 51 fps Better BF1 Fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
32 fps 43 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+34%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 fps +4% 94 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 fps 82 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+22%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 62 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+34%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.23 % Slightly higher market share.
+10%
0.21 %
Value
Value For Money
48 % 60.9 % Better value.
+27%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
81 % 98 % More popular.
+21%
Price
Price (score)
$105 Cheaper.
+22%
$135
Age
Newest
39 Months More recent.
+26%
53 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
87.7 fps 141 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+61%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84 fps 136 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+62%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
74.6 fps 132 fps Much better lighting effects.
+77%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.4 fps 129 fps Much better reflection handling.
+62%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback