Real World Speed
Performance profile from 110,528 user samples
51,285 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 19% MSI(1462 809D)
Poor: 19% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 150th / 650
59,243 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 39% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 32% Asus(1043 049A)
Poor: 32% Great: 39%
SPEED RANK: 104th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
21.4 % 36.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+69%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
26.2 fps 44.8 fps Much better lighting effects.
+71%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
30.2 fps 49.7 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+65%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
25.6 fps 41.1 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+61%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
29.9 fps 47.8 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+60%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
31.2 fps 51.8 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+66%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
28.5 fps 43.2 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+52%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps 133 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+14%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
52 Fps 66 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+29%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
39 Fps 43 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+10%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
113 Fps 132 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+17%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 Fps 75 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+27%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 Fps 51 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
32 Fps 42 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+32%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+6%
91 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
67 Fps 76 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+13%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
47 Fps 62 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+33%
Market Share
Based on 35,690,834 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.15 % 0.17 % Higher market share.
+13%
Value
Value For Money
56.4 % +5% 53.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
78 % 97 % More popular.
+24%
Price
Price (score)
$90 Much cheaper.
+44%
$160
Age
Newest
51 Months More recent.
+22%
65 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
32.5 fps 52.2 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+61%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
36.3 fps 61.2 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+69%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
35 fps 37.4 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
30.6 fps 49.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+62%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
31.4 fps 54.4 fps Much better texture detail.
+73%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
33.8 fps 36 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+7%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback