Real World Speed
Performance profile from 76,194 user samples
37,505 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% HP(103C 3421) 2GB
Worst Bench: 22% Gigabyte(1458 22DD)
Poor: 22% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 115th / 613
38,689 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 43% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 43% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
28.1 % 55.9 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+99%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps 220 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+118%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63 fps 129 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+105%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
75.8 fps 155 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+104%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.4 fps 118 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+52%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
117 fps 262 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+124%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.6 fps 138 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+110%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
85.8 fps 183 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+113%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.4 fps 127 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+58%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
117 fps 139 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+19%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 83 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+71%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
41 fps 49 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+19%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps 143 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+24%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
59 fps 88 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+48%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 49 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
32 fps 47 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+49%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps 95 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+41%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 84 fps Hugely Better World of Tanks fps.
+83%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 110 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+18%
Market Share
Based on 17,567,240 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.27 % 0.38 % Much higher market share.
+41%
Value
Value For Money
65.1 % 93.4 % Much better value.
+43%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % 106 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score)
$104 Much cheaper.
+39%
$170
Age
Newest
34 Months 34 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
88.2 fps 191 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+117%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84.6 fps 173 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+104%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
71.4 fps 148 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+107%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.6 fps 161 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+102%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback