Real World Speed
Performance profile from 95,400 user samples
44,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 33% Asus(1043 04B0)
Poor: 33% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 625
50,852 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 31% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 31% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
43.3 % Faster effective speed.
+25%
34.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
225 fps Much better texture detail.
+30%
173 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
131 fps Faster multi rendering.
+26%
104 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
159 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+29%
123 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+44%
83.3 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
194 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+27%
109 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
182 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+40%
130 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
89.2 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
139 fps +4% 133 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+26%
66 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+16%
42 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
134 fps +2% 131 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+17%
75 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 51 fps +3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
48 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+14%
43 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
109 fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+16%
94 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+16%
82 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 51 fps +2%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+33%
62 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,549,389 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % Much higher market share.
+38%
0.21 %
Value
Value For Money
81.7 % Much better value.
+34%
60.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % 98 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$126 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
$135
Age
Newest
39 Months More recent.
+26%
53 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+36%
141 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
173 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
136 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
155 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
132 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
163 fps Better reflection handling.
+26%
129 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback