Real World Speed
Performance profile from 447,205 user samples
27,608 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 45% Gigabyte(1458 22D7)
Poor: 45% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 51st / 597
419,597 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 60% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
55.9 % 70.7 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
221 fps +5% 211 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
131 fps 147 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+12%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
151 fps 206 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps 161 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+35%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
266 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+11%
239 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps 159 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps 225 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+29%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
127 fps 176 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+39%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps 161 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+15%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 61 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+27%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 68 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+23%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 101 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+15%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
144 fps 188 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+30%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 102 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+17%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 73 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+48%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 57 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+18%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps 136 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+38%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 77 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+56%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 107 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+15%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
77 fps 100 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+29%
Market Share
Based on 12,116,191 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.33 % 5.6 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,597%
Value
Value For Money
81.7 % 96.5 % Better value.
+18%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
102 % 165 % Much more popular.
+62%
Price
Price (score)
$208 Slightly cheaper.
+10%
$230
Age
Newest
27 Months +4% 28 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps 244 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
176 fps 212 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+20%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
151 fps 220 fps Much better lighting effects.
+46%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
162 fps 194 fps Better reflection handling.
+20%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback