Real World Speed
Performance profile from 163,042 user samples
42,811 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 45% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 45% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 69th / 621
120,231 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% EVGA(3842 4999) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 58% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
57.1 % 95.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+68%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
223 fps 318 fps Much better texture detail.
+43%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps 191 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+47%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
158 fps 281 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+78%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps 195 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+64%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
266 fps 370 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+39%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps 213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+53%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps 324 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+79%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 226 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+79%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps 199 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+43%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps 123 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+47%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58 fps 81 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+39%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 80 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+64%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps 217 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+61%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 115 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+31%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 97 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+97%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+73%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 153 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+61%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
108 fps 246 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+127%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 88 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+77%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps 118 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+42%
Market Share
Based on 19,252,668 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.31 % 0.61 % Hugely higher market share.
+97%
Value
Value For Money
79.6 % Much better value.
+68%
47.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % 118 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+65%
$480
Age
Newest
36 Months More recent.
+29%
51 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
191 fps 356 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+86%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps 320 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+83%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
155 fps 302 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+95%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
162 fps 280 fps Much better reflection handling.
+73%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback