Real World Speed
Performance profile from 138,662 user samples
35,725 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Gigabyte(1458 22D7)
Worst Bench: 45% MSI(1462 3411)
Poor: 45% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 59th / 608
102,937 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% EVGA(3842 4995)
Worst Bench: 62% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 62% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 608
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
57.2 % 96.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+68%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
223 fps 319 fps Much better texture detail.
+43%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
131 fps 189 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+44%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
159 fps 283 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+78%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps 194 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+62%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
263 fps 380 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+44%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps 214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
182 fps 325 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+79%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
127 fps 227 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+79%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps 201 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+44%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61 fps 80 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+31%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 81 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+67%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+40%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
145 fps 227 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+57%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 116 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+32%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 97 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+96%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+74%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+63%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 88 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+77%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 122 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+39%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
77 fps 123 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+59%
Market Share
Based on 14,668,211 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.35 % 0.72 % Hugely higher market share.
+106%
Value
Value For Money
95.5 % Better value.
+19%
80.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % 119 % Slightly more popular.
+11%
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+65%
$480
Age
Newest
30 Months Much more recent.
+33%
45 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps 363 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+89%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps 320 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+83%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
154 fps 306 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+99%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
162 fps 280 fps Much better reflection handling.
+73%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $46
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i5-8600K $259Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $750SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback