Real World Speed
Performance profile from 146,830 user samples
103,126 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% XFX(1682 9480)
Worst Bench: 50% PowerColor(148C 2372)
Poor: 50% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 597
43,704 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 59% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.8 % 66.5 % +4%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps 260 fps +2%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
128 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
165 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps 178 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+42%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps +4% 287 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
133 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
203 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+18%
172 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps 187 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps 179 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+14%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+22%
46 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61 fps +2% 60 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 100 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
178 fps +2% 174 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+11%
79 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+11%
68 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54 fps 54 fps +0%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+12%
112 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+36%
50 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps +4% 99 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 98 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+5%
Market Share
Based on 12,184,858 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.03 % Hugely higher market share.
+194%
0.35 %
Value
Value For Money
76.4 % +2% 75.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
149 % Much more popular.
+48%
101 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
$304
Age
Newest
29 Months More recent.
+29%
41 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps +1% 213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+10%
166 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
179 fps 196 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+9%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
158 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
Intel Core i5-8600K $240Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $799Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback