Real World Speed
Performance profile from 195,652 user samples
151,104 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 41% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 625
44,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 33% Asus(1043 04B0)
Poor: 33% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
50.2 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
43.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
259 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
225 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
188 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+18%
159 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps +5% 120 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+13%
264 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
138 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
182 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps +5% 126 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
155 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+11%
139 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
+11%
83 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 fps +3% 57 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+12%
49 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Better LoL Fps.
+20%
134 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+8%
88 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+48%
49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+9%
48 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+45%
109 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+32%
96 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+37%
50 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Better WoT Fps.
+23%
82 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,549,389 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.74 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
0.29 %
Value
Value For Money
84.9 % +4% 81.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
90 %
Price
Price (score)
$140 $126 Slightly cheaper.
+10%
Age
Newest
41 Months 39 Months +5%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+12%
192 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+5%
173 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
155 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps +5% 163 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback