Real World Speed
Performance profile from 185,835 user samples
152,043 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% MSI(1462 3413)
Worst Bench: 41% Gigabyte(1458 22E7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 41% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 621
33,792 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 66% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 66% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
50 % 83.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+68%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
258 fps 480 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+86%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps 181 fps Faster multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
187 fps 320 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+71%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 283 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+125%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps 577 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+93%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 190 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
210 fps 366 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+74%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 301 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+128%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
155 fps 157 fps +1%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+32%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 fps 91 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+55%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 76 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+39%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps 186 fps Better LoL Fps.
+16%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 125 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+31%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps 101 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 fps 86 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+62%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 fps 170 fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+7%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 fps 80 fps Better WoW Fps.
+18%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps 129 fps Better WoT Fps.
+27%
Market Share
Based on 20,956,027 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.75 % Much higher market share.
+39%
0.54 %
Value
Value For Money
84.6 % Better value.
+30%
65.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % 109 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$140 Much cheaper.
+54%
$305
Age
Newest
40 Months 26 Months Much more recent.
+35%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
213 fps 346 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+62%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps 238 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+31%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps 291 fps Much better lighting effects.
+58%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps 225 fps Much better reflection handling.
+32%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $344Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback