Real World Speed
Performance profile from 283,548 user samples
151,104 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 41% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 625
132,444 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 63% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
50.2 % 77.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+55%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
259 fps 326 fps Better texture detail.
+26%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps 193 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
188 fps 288 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+53%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 198 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+57%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps 379 fps Better peak texture detail.
+27%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+45%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps 322 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+52%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 223 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+69%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
155 fps 197 fps Better CSGO Fps.
+27%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 124 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+33%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 fps 81 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+38%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 80 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+46%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps 218 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+36%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 115 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+21%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps 98 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+34%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 fps 83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+57%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 fps 242 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+53%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
126 fps 151 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+20%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 fps 88 fps Better WoW Fps.
+30%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps 120 fps Better WoT Fps.
+18%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.74 % Much higher market share.
+35%
0.55 %
Value
Value For Money
84.9 % Hugely better value.
+121%
38.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 106 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$140 Much cheaper.
+71%
$480
Age
Newest
41 Months More recent.
+24%
54 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps 357 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+66%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps 318 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+75%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps 311 fps Much better lighting effects.
+68%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps 284 fps Much better reflection handling.
+66%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback