Real World Speed
Performance profile from 327,516 user samples
176,513 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 43% AMD(1002 0B37)
Poor: 43% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 69th / 639
151,003 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 36B7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
51.2 % 78.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+53%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
176 fps 315 fps Much better lighting effects.
+79%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps 193 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
186 fps 289 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+55%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps 362 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+68%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+45%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps 324 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+53%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
154 Fps 196 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+27%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps 121 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+32%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 Fps 81 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+37%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 Fps 80 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+44%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 Fps 215 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+35%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 Fps 115 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+21%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 Fps 98 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 Fps 82 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+55%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 Fps 244 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+54%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
126 Fps 153 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+21%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 Fps 91 Fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+34%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps 121 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+20%
Market Share
Based on 31,326,195 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.56 % Much higher market share.
+44%
0.39 %
Value
Value For Money
64.5 % Hugely better value.
+95%
33.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 106 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$188 Much cheaper.
+66%
$560
Age
Newest
50 Months More recent.
+21%
63 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps 319 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+75%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
297 fps 373 fps Better peak texture detail.
+26%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 225 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+70%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
168 fps 285 fps Much better reflection handling.
+70%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps 323 fps Better texture detail.
+26%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 197 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+56%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition to better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $330Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback