Real World Speed
Performance profile from 78,401 user samples
27,706 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 27% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 21% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 21% Great: 27%
SPEED RANK: 111th / 625
50,695 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% EVGA(3842 1263)
Worst Bench: 70% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 70% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
24.2 % 74.9 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+210%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
118 fps 275 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+133%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.8 fps 221 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+246%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
88.9 fps 265 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+198%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.9 fps 175 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+125%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
136 fps 303 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+123%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68 fps 242 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+256%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
100 fps 281 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+181%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
82.8 fps 191 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+131%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
111 fps 160 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+44%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
52 fps 134 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+158%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 75 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+63%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 fps 172 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+44%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 287 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+129%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 fps 154 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+102%
Market Share
Based on 21,722,450 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.24 % 1.46 % Hugely higher market share.
+508%
Value
Value For Money
32 % 67.2 % Hugely better value.
+110%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
80 % 140 % Much more popular.
+75%
Price
Price (score)
$179 Much cheaper.
+32%
$264
Age
Newest
30 Months 8 Months Much more recent.
+73%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
100 fps 324 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+224%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
87.2 fps 253 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+190%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
80.7 fps 298 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+269%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
80 fps 237 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+196%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback