Real World Speed
Performance profile from 157,597 user samples
106,745 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% XFX(1682 C570)
Worst Bench: 39% Asus(1043 04C2)
Poor: 39% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 625
50,852 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 31% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 31% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
34.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
245 fps Much better texture detail.
+42%
173 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps Faster multi rendering.
+29%
104 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+42%
123 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
123 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+48%
83.3 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
280 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+44%
194 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
141 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+29%
109 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
193 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+48%
130 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+47%
89.2 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 133 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+22%
66 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+25%
42 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
138 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+5%
131 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+22%
75 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
52 fps +3% 51 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+18%
43 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+39%
94 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
111 fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+34%
82 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+45%
51 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+38%
62 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,549,726 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.64 % Hugely higher market share.
+681%
0.21 %
Value
Value For Money
86 % Much better value.
+41%
60.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % +2% 98 %
Price
Price (score)
$130 +4% $135
Age
Newest
30 Months Much more recent.
+43%
53 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
198 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+40%
141 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+33%
136 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
173 fps Much better lighting effects.
+31%
132 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
167 fps Better reflection handling.
+29%
129 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback