Real World Speed
Performance profile from 113,466 user samples
94,539 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% PowerColor(148C 2379)
Worst Bench: 39% Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 621
18,927 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.2 % 61.2 % Faster effective speed.
+29%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
245 fps 323 fps Much better texture detail.
+32%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps 158 fps Faster multi rendering.
+18%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps 235 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
123 fps 146 fps Faster complex splatting.
+19%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
282 fps 364 fps Better peak texture detail.
+29%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
143 fps 165 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
193 fps 256 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 151 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+14%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 154 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+23%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 93 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+16%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 69 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+12%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps 70 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+32%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps 164 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+19%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92 fps 108 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 70 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+41%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps 205 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+58%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps 95 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+12%
Market Share
Based on 20,002,068 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.71 % Hugely higher market share.
+185%
0.6 %
Value
Value For Money
86.1 % Better value.
+28%
67.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % 116 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score)
$130 Much cheaper.
+40%
$216
Age
Newest
28 Months 10 Months Much more recent.
+64%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
199 fps 256 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps 213 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+17%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
174 fps 227 fps Much better lighting effects.
+30%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
167 fps 203 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback