Real World Speed
Performance profile from 534,243 user samples
86,440 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Asus(1043 04C2)
Worst Bench: 39% PowerColor(148C 2379)
Poor: 39% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 64th / 621
447,803 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 44% MSI(1462 3160)
Poor: 44% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.1 % 49.7 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+5%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
244 fps Better texture detail.
+24%
197 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps 151 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps 184 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+6%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
123 fps 124 fps +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
280 fps Better peak texture detail.
+26%
222 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
142 fps 163 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
192 fps 202 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+5%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 139 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 156 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+24%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 94 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+16%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 63 fps +2%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps +0% 53 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps 157 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+14%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92 fps 97 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52 fps 62 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps +4% 48 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps 195 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+50%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps 120 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+9%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+16%
63 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps 98 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+15%
Market Share
Based on 20,104,545 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.73 % 2.08 % Higher market share.
+20%
Value
Value For Money
85.9 % Hugely better value.
+191%
29.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % 105 % +5%
Price
Price (score)
$130 Much cheaper.
+67%
$399
Age
Newest
29 Months Much more recent.
+52%
60 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
198 fps 218 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps 193 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
174 fps 193 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+11%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
167 fps 175 fps +5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $60
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $207
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback