Real World Speed
Performance profile from 110,028 user samples
16,168 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% MSI(1462 341B)
Worst Bench: 49% Gigabyte(1458 22F7)
Poor: 49% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 597
93,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 71% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
60.3 % 96.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+60%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 322 fps Much better texture detail.
+34%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps 192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+43%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
165 fps 285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+73%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
123 fps 195 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+59%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
281 fps 379 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+35%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
143 fps 215 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+50%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps 325 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+80%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 225 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+70%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
151 fps 204 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+35%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 81 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+78%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57 fps 80 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+41%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92 fps 116 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+26%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
165 fps 230 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+39%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+54%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps 154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+15%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
79 fps 119 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+51%
Market Share
Based on 12,741,976 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.83 % Slightly higher market share.
+8%
0.77 %
Value
Value For Money
103 % Much better value.
+39%
73.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
84 % 113 % Much more popular.
+35%
Price
Price (score)
$165 Much cheaper.
+70%
$550
Age
Newest
19 Months Much more recent.
+56%
43 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps 363 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+84%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps 321 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+77%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
170 fps 305 fps Much better lighting effects.
+79%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
166 fps 280 fps Much better reflection handling.
+69%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $332Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback