CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
220 EFps 220 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps 204 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 65,478 user samples
32,739 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% PowerColor(148C 2398)
Worst Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 99% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 625
32,739 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% PowerColor(148C 2398)
Worst Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 99% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
114 % 114 %
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
114 % 114 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
774 fps 774 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
235 fps 235 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
394 fps 394 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
356 fps 356 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
862 fps 862 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
245 fps 245 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
423 fps 423 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
375 fps 375 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,658,033 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.83 % 1.83 %
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.83 % 1.83 %
Value
Value For Money
66.6 % 66.6 %
Value
Value For Money
66.6 % 66.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
120 % 120 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
120 % 120 %
Price
Price (score)
$404 $404
Price
Price (score)
$404 $404
Age
Newest
4 Months 4 Months
Age
Newest
4 Months 4 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
440 fps 440 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps 309 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
400 fps 400 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
295 fps 295 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback