CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
217 EFps +0% 216 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+13%
86 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
119 EFps +3% 115 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
113 EFps +4% 109 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
139 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+9%
127 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 53,028 user samples
42,112 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 99% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 627
10,916 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% PowerColor(148C 2399)
Worst Bench: 82% Asus(1043 04E4) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 82% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
105 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
88.2 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
403 fps Better lighting effects.
+21%
334 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
237 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+14%
208 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
397 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
330 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
441 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+14%
388 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+8%
228 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
424 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
364 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,315,070 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.01 % Hugely higher market share.
+287%
0.52 %
Value
Value For Money
64 % Slightly better value.
+13%
56.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
118 % 132 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$390 $370 Slightly cheaper.
+5%
Age
Newest
5 Months 5 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
287 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
866 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
743 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
373 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
346 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
296 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+14%
260 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
779 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
661 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
358 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+15%
312 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 (RDNA) GPU which is built on a 7nm process. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT) and 8 GB of GDDR6 capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its own default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback