CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps +4% 220 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+13%
97 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps +4% 133 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps +2% 125 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+10%
143 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 130,179 user samples
109,626 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 99% PowerColor(148C 2398)
Poor: 99% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 636
20,553 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 84% Sapphire(1DA2 E408)
Poor: 84% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 636
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
88.1 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
389 fps Better lighting effects.
+15%
337 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
238 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+15%
207 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
401 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
330 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
444 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
383 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
229 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
428 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+18%
362 fps
Market Share
Based on 26,207,581 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2 % Hugely higher market share.
+245%
0.58 %
Value
Value For Money
67.9 % Slightly better value.
+6%
64.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
118 % 144 % More popular.
+22%
Price
Price (score)
$370 $325 Slightly cheaper.
+12%
Age
Newest
9 Months 9 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
310 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
286 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
864 fps Better peak texture detail.
+19%
728 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
379 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
350 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
292 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+14%
257 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
774 fps Better texture detail.
+19%
651 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
364 fps Faster complex splatting.
+15%
316 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $84SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback