CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps +4% 220 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+13%
97 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps +4% 133 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps +2% 125 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+10%
143 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 536,979 user samples
461,061 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 91% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 692
75,918 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5705)
Worst Bench: 78% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 78% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 69th / 692
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
99 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
85 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
125 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
107 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
140 fps Better reflection handling.
+15%
122 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
118 fps Faster multi rendering.
+15%
103 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
142 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+18%
120 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
136 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+18%
115 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
146 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
136 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
122 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
114 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
154 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+19%
129 fps
Market Share
Based on 58,598,090 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.34 % Hugely higher market share.
+580%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
81.3 % Much better value.
+33%
61 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 69 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$289 Cheaper.
+12%
$330
Age
Newest
42 Months 42 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
219 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
180 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
98.1 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
91 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
164 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
94.6 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18%
80.2 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060 $325Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $850Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback