COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
AMD
VS
Effective Speed 
+14%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 346,584 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 714
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		98.3 % Faster effective speed.
+14% 		86.6 %
Average Score 
+19%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		124 fps Better lighting effects.
+12% 		111 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		139 fps Better reflection handling.
+29% 		108 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		118 fps Faster multi rendering.
+28% 		92.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		140 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+6% 		132 fps
Overclocked Score 
+18%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		133 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+9% 		122 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		146 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+28% 		114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		122 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+28% 		95.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		151 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+6% 		143 fps
Game FPS 
+16%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		242 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+9% 		223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		167 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+37% 		121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		94 Fps 104 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+11%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		117 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+34% 		88 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		225 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+16% 		194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		135 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+6% 		127 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		115 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+31% 		88 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		215 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+7% 		202 Fps
Value & Sentiment 
+434%
Market Share
Based on 67,453,250 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.33 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,550% 		0.02 %
Value
Value For Money 		117 % Hugely better value.
+128% 		51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % Slightly more popular.
+9% 		53 %
Price
Price (score) 		$199 Much cheaper.
+50% 		$400
Nice To Haves 
+22%
Age
Newest 		57 Months More recent.
+29% 		80 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		229 fps Better peak texture detail.
+16% 		197 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		98.2 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25% 		78.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		205 fps Better texture detail.
+15% 		178 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		94.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
+24% 		75.8 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 98.3%
Average Bench 86.6%
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
254,908
91,676
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback