CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps 251 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+10%
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+26%
87 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+23%
112 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+17%
109 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+35%
116 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 770,546 user samples
66,635 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 99% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 635
703,911 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
78.2 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
394 fps Better lighting effects.
+30%
304 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
239 fps Faster multi rendering.
+20%
200 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
400 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+39%
287 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
444 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
343 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
220 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
428 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+36%
314 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,914,665 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.09 % 3.62 % Much higher market share.
+73%
Value
Value For Money
61.8 % Better value.
+15%
53.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
123 % +1% 122 %
Price
Price (score)
$407 $346 Slightly cheaper.
+15%
Age
Newest
6 Months Hugely more recent.
+86%
43 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps 312 fps +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
873 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+151%
348 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
378 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+54%
245 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
294 fps +3% 285 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
785 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+157%
305 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
363 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+63%
223 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback