CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps 251 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+10%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+26%
87 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+23%
112 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+17%
109 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+35%
116 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,245,174 user samples
235,590 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% XFX(1682 5701)
Worst Bench: 97% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 97% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 651
1,009,584 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% EVGA(3842 6676)
Worst Bench: 71% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
107 % Much faster effective speed.
+32%
81.1 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
134 fps Much better lighting effects.
+33%
101 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
95.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
137 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+43%
95.5 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
147 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
103 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
148 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+41%
105 fps
Market Share
Based on 35,827,705 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.47 % 3.31 % Much higher market share.
+34%
Value
Value For Money
63.3 % Slightly better value.
+9%
58.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % 136 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $330 Cheaper.
+18%
Age
Newest
16 Months Much more recent.
+70%
53 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
149 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+24%
120 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
258 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+135%
110 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
99.3 fps 106 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
143 fps Much better reflection handling.
+30%
110 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
212 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+119%
97 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
95.7 fps 96 fps +0%
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback