CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+22%
188 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+124%
49 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+146%
56 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+159%
49 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+128%
69 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 567,019 user samples
344,461 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 92% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 92% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 683
222,558 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 46% EVGA(3842 1257) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 40% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 40% Great: 46%
SPEED RANK: 115th / 683
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
105 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+143%
43.1 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
124 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+123%
55.5 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
139 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+134%
59.4 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+122%
52.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
141 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+178%
50.7 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
137 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+128%
60.2 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
148 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+85%
80 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
122 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+86%
65.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
154 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+186%
53.9 fps
Market Share
Based on 54,233,376 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.7 % 1.32 % Hugely higher market share.
+89%
Value
Value For Money
60.7 % 66 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % 80 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
Price
Price (score)
$410 $155 Much cheaper.
+62%
Age
Newest
37 Months Slightly more recent.
+5%
39 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
217 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+292%
55.3 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
98.4 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+101%
49 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+288%
50.3 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
94.7 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+112%
44.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback