Real World Speed
Performance profile from 112,591 user samples
6,575 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 119% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 100% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 100% Great: 119%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 621
106,016 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 60% Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
113 % Much faster effective speed.
+44%
77.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
755 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+134%
322 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
234 fps Faster multi rendering.
+21%
194 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
387 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+34%
289 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
353 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+78%
198 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
817 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+117%
377 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
244 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
214 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
409 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+27%
323 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
370 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+63%
227 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
236 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+19%
199 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
163 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+33%
123 fps
Market Share
Based on 19,413,043 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.94 % Much higher market share.
+54%
0.61 %
Value
Value For Money
66.7 % Much better value.
+73%
38.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
117 % Slightly more popular.
+15%
102 %
Price
Price (score)
$400 Cheaper.
+17%
$480
Age
Newest
1 Months Hugely more recent.
+98%
51 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
428 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+20%
358 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps 321 fps +4%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
401 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
312 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
294 fps +4% 284 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 5700 XT is AMD’s latest flagship 1440p gaming graphics card which has been released alongside their 7nm Zen 2 processors. The 5000 series of GPUs feature the first iteration of AMD’s new RDNA 7nm microarchitecture, also known as Navi, which is able to deliver better and more efficient performance than the previous generation (Vega). Specifically the 5700 XT has 40 compute units (compared to 36 in the RX 5700 - a cut down version) and a game frequency (comparable to NVIDIA’s boost frequency) of 1.76 GHz (versus 1.63 GHz in the RX 5700). AMD have limited the frequency to a max boost clock of 1.9 GHz. Like the 5700, the 5700 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 high-speed memory, capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth and features PCIe 4.0 support. The 5700 XT has slightly more power consumption with a 225 Watt TDP compared to 180 Watts for the 5700. The first benchmarks suggest that these differences in specifications result in the 5700 XT having around a 15% faster effective speed than the 5700 for a 13% price premium. The $399 5700 XT is also around 10% (varies by game) faster than the NVIDIA’s $460 RTX 2070. To counter, NVIDIA have announced refresh versions of their recent RTX models in the form of the RTX 2060 Super, 2070 Super and 2080 Super, which are poised to offer better performance and value than the previous generations. The RTX Super cards are also due for release now (July 2019) so shop prices will determine where the best value for money lies. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback