CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps 245 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+15%
96 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+16%
119 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+9%
117 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+20%
131 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 711,524 user samples
345,086 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 97% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 97% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 661
366,438 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Asus(1043 868F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 82% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 82% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 661
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
105 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
89 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps Better lighting effects.
+13%
114 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
142 fps Better reflection handling.
+18%
120 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps 134 fps Faster multi rendering.
+16%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
136 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
100 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+14%
124 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
148 fps 171 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps 146 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+21%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
147 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+37%
107 fps
Market Share
Based on 41,965,151 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.25 % 2.34 % Hugely higher market share.
+87%
Value
Value For Money
62.5 % +0% 62.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % 85 % More popular.
+13%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $338 Cheaper.
+16%
Age
Newest
21 Months More recent.
+22%
27 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
236 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+90%
124 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
99 fps 99 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
201 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+83%
110 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
95.5 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+5%
90.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback