CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
220 EFps 229 EFps +4%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps 110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+13%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
133 EFps 138 EFps +4%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
125 EFps 127 EFps +2%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
143 EFps 157 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+10%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 216,846 user samples
33,399 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% MSI(1462 3811)
Worst Bench: 83% ASRock(1849 5102) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 83% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 639
183,447 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 99% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 99% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
88 % 106 % Faster effective speed.
+21%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
329 fps 393 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
207 fps 240 fps Faster multi rendering.
+16%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
329 fps 402 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
382 fps 450 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+18%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
227 fps 247 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
360 fps 428 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+19%
Market Share
Based on 31,326,195 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.36 % 2.47 % Hugely higher market share.
+586%
Value
Value For Money
61.4 % 64.4 % +5%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
147 % More popular.
+18%
125 %
Price
Price (score)
$340 Cheaper.
+13%
$391
Age
Newest
13 Months 13 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
283 fps 308 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
710 fps 829 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
350 fps 381 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+9%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps 295 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
624 fps 736 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
315 fps 368 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $330Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback