CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
191 EFps 204 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
89 EFps 98 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+10%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
118 EFps 121 EFps +3%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
99 EFps 102 EFps +3%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 134 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+24%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,183 user samples
6,775 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5705) ≥ 4GB; xfx DD Ultra 5700
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 20th / 625
31,408 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 102% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 102% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.6 % 114 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
658 fps 776 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
205 fps 236 fps Faster multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
327 fps 395 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+21%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
309 fps 356 fps Faster complex splatting.
+15%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
727 fps 866 fps Better peak texture detail.
+19%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
227 fps 245 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
357 fps 423 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+18%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
344 fps 373 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.43 % 1.73 % Hugely higher market share.
+302%
Value
Value For Money
66.1 % 66.8 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
126 % +2% 124 %
Price
Price (score)
$350 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
$404
Age
Newest
4 Months 4 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
380 fps 441 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
283 fps 308 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
350 fps 401 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+15%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
257 fps 296 fps Better reflection handling.
+15%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range, first generation Navi 10 gaming GPU. Navi (aka Radeon DNA or RDNA) is built on a 7nm process and includes new anti-lag and image sharpening technology. The 5700 is a high performance 1440p card with 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT), a game frequency (comparable to Nvidia’s boost frequency) of 1.63 GHz (versus 1.76 GHz in the 5700 XT) and 8 GB of GDDR6 high-speed memory, delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT, its approximately 10% faster and more power hungry sister card (225 W for the 5700 XT, versus 180 W for the 5700). Not to be outplayed, Nvidia have swiftly responded by announcing new Super (refresh) versions of the RTX 2060, 2070 and 2080, for sale by the end of July 2019. Benchmarks and prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for buck. What is certain is that there is a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback