CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
191 EFps 214 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+12%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
89 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+22%
73 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
118 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+36%
87 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
99 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+25%
79 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+9%
99 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 55,735 user samples
6,622 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 86% XFX(1682 5705) ≥ 4GB; xfx DD Ultra 5700
Poor: 86% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 625
49,113 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+32%
73.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
659 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+141%
273 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
204 fps 220 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
325 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23%
264 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
307 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+74%
176 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
718 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+139%
300 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
227 fps 237 fps +4%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
348 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+25%
279 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
343 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+81%
189 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,504,541 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.41 % 1.36 % Hugely higher market share.
+232%
Value
Value For Money
65.7 % 67.2 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
125 % 140 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$350 $260 Cheaper.
+26%
Age
Newest
4 Months Much more recent.
+50%
8 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
374 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
322 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
282 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+12%
252 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
347 fps Better lighting effects.
+16%
299 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
256 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
236 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range, first generation Navi 10 gaming GPU. Navi (aka Radeon DNA or RDNA) is built on a 7nm process and includes new anti-lag and image sharpening technology. The 5700 is a high performance 1440p card with 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT), a game frequency (comparable to Nvidia’s boost frequency) of 1.63 GHz (versus 1.76 GHz in the 5700 XT) and 8 GB of GDDR6 high-speed memory, delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT, its approximately 10% faster and more power hungry sister card (225 W for the 5700 XT, versus 180 W for the 5700). Not to be outplayed, Nvidia have swiftly responded by announcing new Super (refresh) versions of the RTX 2060, 2070 and 2080, for sale by the end of July 2019. Benchmarks and prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for buck. What is certain is that there is a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback