COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
Nvidia
VS
Effective Speed 
+8%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 289,948 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
75,918 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5705)
Worst Bench: 78% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 78% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 714
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		85 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8% 		79 %
Average Score 
+11%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		107 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+9% 		98.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		122 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+6% 		115 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		103 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6% 		97 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		120 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23% 		97.7 fps
Overclocked Score 
+9%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		115 fps +4% 111 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		136 fps +3% 132 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		114 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9% 		105 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		129 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+21% 		107 fps
Game FPS 
+14%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		184 Fps 196 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		152 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+25% 		121 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		89 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+12% 		80 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		216 Fps +0% 215 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		112 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+37% 		82 Fps
Value & Sentiment 
+36%
Market Share
Based on 67,445,565 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.06 % 0.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+317%
Value
Value For Money 		73.2 % Hugely better value.
+119% 		33.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		68 % +3% 66 %
Price
Price (score) 		$275 Much cheaper.
+51% 		$560
Nice To Haves 
+31%
Age
Newest 		57 Months Much more recent.
+47% 		107 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		180 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+59% 		113 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		91 fps 97.4 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		164 fps Much better texture detail.
+64% 		100 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		80.2 fps 87.9 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+10%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 85%
Average Bench 79%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
75,918
214,030
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback