Real World Speed
Performance profile from 188,466 user samples
31,641 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% PowerColor(148C 2399)
Worst Bench: 83% Asus(1043 04E4) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 83% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 639
156,825 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
88.1 % Faster effective speed.
+12%
78.8 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
333 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
313 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
207 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
195 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
330 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+13%
291 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
390 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
360 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
229 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
215 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
364 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+12%
324 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
184 Fps 196 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
152 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+25%
121 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+12%
80 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
216 Fps +0% 215 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
112 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+37%
82 Fps
Market Share
Based on 31,560,533 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.36 % 0.4 % Higher market share.
+11%
Value
Value For Money
61.4 % Hugely better value.
+84%
33.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
147 % Much more popular.
+37%
107 %
Price
Price (score)
$340 Much cheaper.
+39%
$560
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+79%
63 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps 319 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+12%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
706 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+88%
376 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
351 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+55%
226 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps 286 fps Better reflection handling.
+13%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
625 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+91%
328 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
315 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+59%
198 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $319Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback