Real World Speed
Performance profile from 203,551 user samples
159,977 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Device(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Poor: 58% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 611
43,574 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 55% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 611
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+5%
66.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
283 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+9%
259 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
145 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+14%
127 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
206 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
172 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps 178 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+37%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+12%
286 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
132 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
227 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+26%
180 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps 187 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+35%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
151 fps 158 fps +4%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
69 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+18%
59 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+14%
80 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+23%
46 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps 174 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+13%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps +0% 100 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+9%
68 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
64 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+20%
53 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+8%
117 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
69 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+33%
51 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96 fps 99 fps +3%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps +3% 98 fps
Market Share
Based on 15,593,107 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.4 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,208%
0.26 %
Value
Value For Money
114 % Much better value.
+51%
75.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
125 % More popular.
+20%
104 %
Price
Price (score)
$178 Much cheaper.
+42%
$304
Age
Newest
23 Months Much more recent.
+49%
45 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
225 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+6%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
165 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps +2% 193 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
178 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+13%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $75
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $110SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback