Real World Speed
Performance profile from 90,349 user samples
53,466 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 57% MSI(1462 3418)
Poor: 57% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 595
36,883 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 56% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 56% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 595
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
69.3 % +5% 66.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
281 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+9%
258 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
144 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
127 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
198 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+21%
164 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps 177 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+35%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+12%
287 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
155 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+15%
135 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
218 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+24%
176 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps 189 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+36%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
156 fps 179 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+15%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+27%
46 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps 100 fps +2%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+13%
59 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps 174 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+8%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+14%
77 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+7%
69 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+16%
55 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
79 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+59%
50 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+10%
112 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps 100 fps +2%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps +2% 99 fps
Market Share
Based on 11,402,891 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+688%
0.26 %
Value
Value For Money
97.1 % Better value.
+30%
74.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
116 % Slightly more popular.
+15%
101 %
Price
Price (score)
$221 Cheaper.
+27%
$304
Age
Newest
17 Months Much more recent.
+58%
40 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+6%
216 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
192 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+15%
167 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps +1% 195 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
178 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+13%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback