CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
252 EFps +5% 240 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
59 EFps 86 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+46%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
79 EFps 99 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+25%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps 93 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+33%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
84 EFps 120 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+43%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 713,744 user samples
553,572 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% MSI(1462 3418)
Worst Bench: 48% MSI(1462 3418)
Poor: 48% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 75th / 651
160,172 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% MSI(1462 375A)
Worst Bench: 70% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
53.5 % 78.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+46%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
67.4 fps 97.7 fps Much better lighting effects.
+45%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
63.4 fps 101 fps Much better reflection handling.
+59%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.7 fps 98.1 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
71.4 fps 90.2 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
76.6 fps 106 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+38%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
66.8 fps 138 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+107%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.3 fps 111 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+63%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.5 fps 96.1 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+22%
Market Share
Based on 36,087,486 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+119%
1.3 %
Value
Value For Money
68.5 % +4% 66.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
136 % 149 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$185 Much cheaper.
+34%
$280
Age
Newest
43 Months 21 Months Much more recent.
+51%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps +3% 97.9 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
49.7 fps 82.2 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+65%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
90.6 fps +3% 88.2 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
47.2 fps 74.7 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+58%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback