COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
AMD
VS
Effective Speed 
+77%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 135,822 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 714
13,762 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% AMD(1002 081E)
Worst Bench: 91% AMD(1002 081E)
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		56.9 % 101 % Much faster effective speed.
+77%
Average Score 
+72%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		71.8 fps 131 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+82%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		68.1 fps 112 fps Much better reflection handling.
+64%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		67.7 fps 104 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		81.4 fps 153 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+88%
Overclocked Score 
+70%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		79.8 fps 140 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+75%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		70.5 fps 123 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+74%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		71.3 fps 108 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+51%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		90.3 fps 161 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+78%
Value & Sentiment 
+386%
Market Share
Based on 67,454,146 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.14 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,300% 		0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		67.4 % Hugely better value.
+137% 		28.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		77 % Much more popular.
+31% 		59 %
Price
Price (score) 		$200 Much cheaper.
+76% 		$841
Nice To Haves 
+68%
Age
Newest 		65 Months 62 Months +5%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		111 fps 230 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+107%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		54 fps 85.6 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+59%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		99.9 fps 209 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+109%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		52.7 fps 84.1 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+60%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 56.9%
Average Bench 101%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The widely anticipated (albeit currently not widely available) prosumer AMD Radeon VII is finally available. It features a next generation Vega 20 GPU which is based on a 7nm manufacturing process, compared to 14nm in the first generation flagship: the RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than the RX Vega 64 (3840 vs 4096) but clock speeds have been boosted up to 1800 MHz compared to 1546 MHz in the RX Vega 64, the net result is 13.8 TFLOPS single precision computations (versus 13.4 TFLOPS for the RX Vega 64). On the negative side, the Radeon VII is designed with three cooling fans which can get noisy and early software drivers are reported to be buggy. Whilst there is a modest 16% performance advantage over the RX Vega 64, initial benchmarks indicate that the Radeon VII has an effective speed which is 6% short of the similarly priced RTX 2080.  [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
122,060
13,762
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback