Real World Speed
Performance profile from 73,054 user samples
23,941 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 2311) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 625
49,113 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
60.7 % 73.7 % Faster effective speed.
+21%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
317 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
273 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
158 fps 220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+39%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
232 fps 264 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
146 fps 176 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
360 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
300 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
167 fps 237 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+42%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
258 fps 279 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+8%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
152 fps 189 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
154 fps 160 fps +3%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 134 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+44%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
69 fps 95 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+39%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 75 fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+8%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
164 fps 172 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+5%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
108 fps 112 fps +3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 85 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+20%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
205 fps 287 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+40%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 137 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+43%
Market Share
Based on 21,504,541 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.58 % 1.36 % Hugely higher market share.
+134%
Value
Value For Money
67.2 % +0% 67.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
113 % 140 % More popular.
+24%
Price
Price (score)
$214 Cheaper.
+18%
$260
Age
Newest
11 Months 8 Months More recent.
+27%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
254 fps 322 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
213 fps 252 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
226 fps 299 fps Much better lighting effects.
+32%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
203 fps 236 fps Better reflection handling.
+16%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback