Real World Speed
Performance profile from 166,464 user samples
23,792 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Poor: 52% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 625
142,672 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% EVGA(3842 2173)
Worst Bench: 89% Gigabyte(1458 37AD)
Poor: 89% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
60.4 % 102 % Much faster effective speed.
+68%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
318 fps 410 fps Better texture detail.
+29%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
158 fps 362 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+129%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
232 fps 373 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+61%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
146 fps 226 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+55%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
361 fps 470 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+30%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
166 fps 392 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+136%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
257 fps 408 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+59%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
151 fps 249 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+65%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
154 fps 237 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+53%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 147 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+57%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
69 fps 103 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+50%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 99 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+42%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
164 fps 241 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+47%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
108 fps 122 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 105 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+49%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
205 fps 276 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+35%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 162 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+70%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.6 % 1.79 % Hugely higher market share.
+198%
Value
Value For Money
66.9 % Better value.
+15%
58 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
112 % Slightly more popular.
+14%
98 %
Price
Price (score)
$214 Much cheaper.
+48%
$415
Age
Newest
11 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
12 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
255 fps 434 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+70%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
213 fps 346 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+62%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps 388 fps Much better lighting effects.
+75%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
203 fps 316 fps Much better reflection handling.
+56%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback