Real World Speed
Performance profile from 21,331 user samples
16,057 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 209% Sapphire(1DA2 440E) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 177% Sapphire(1DA2 440E) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 177% Great: 209%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 714
5,274 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 214% PowerColor(148C 2420) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 183% XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 183% Great: 214%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
195 % 199 % +2%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
244 fps 249 fps +2%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
250 fps 263 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+5%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
403 fps 410 fps +2%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps 215 fps +1%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
270 fps +1% 268 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
265 fps 281 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
429 fps 450 fps +5%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
224 fps 234 fps +4%
Market Share
Based on 67,421,191 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.15 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
0.05 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
60 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
56 %
Age
Newest
40 Months 23+ Months Much more recent.
+42%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
586 fps 590 fps +1%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
354 fps 367 fps +4%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
519 fps 526 fps +1%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
333 fps 336 fps +1%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 6900-XT assumes the flagship position in AMD’s latest RX 6000 series of GPUs which deliver a huge generational jump in performance. The $1,000 USD 6900-XT offers a small improvement (11% more compute units) over the already launched $650 USD RX 6800-XT. AMD have upgraded the single fan cooler to a more efficient triple fan solution, perhaps indicating a shift in focus from benchmark busting headlines to user experience. Following the widespread issues that users faced with the 5000 and Vega series, we are cautiously optimistic that AMD have taken steps to ensure driver and hardware stability. Given the value for money now offered by both Nvidia and AMD, with the 3070 and 6800-XT, it is difficult to recommend any thousand dollar graphics cards to most gamers. 16GB of VRAM is a key feature of the 6900-XT. At higher resolutions and detail settings, performance can bottleneck without sufficient GPU memory. AMD's marketers often cherry pick obscure games with high res/settings, the details of which are rarely disclosed, then compare the results with cards that have less memory. In that scenario, the cards with less memory look weaker than they would at 1080p. The 1080p results are sometimes omitted, or worse, partially omitted and frame drops are conveniently ignored. Most users will see little benefit in gaming at high resolutions. Without drastic price cuts (MSRP $1000 USD) and miraculous marketing via countless promo videos and sponsored reviews, the 6900 XT will struggle to compete, partly because it lacks RTX+DLSS which is required for the best gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. Users should be wary of AMD’s army of social media accounts, they aim to dupe shoppers any way they can. [Dec '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Whilst the drought in the GPU market continues, street prices for AMD cards are around 50% lower than comparable (based on headline average fps figures) Nvidia cards. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. The combined market share for all of AMD’s RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers (Steam stats) is just 2.12% whilst Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5.03%. AMD’s Neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins and ignore the losses. Experienced gamers know all too well that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. [May '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback