UserBenchmark: AMD RX 7900-XTX vs Nvidia RTX 3050

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

$1,000

Nvidia

BUY • $278

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 49,470 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

5,548 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 293% XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 216% PowerColor(148C 2422) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 216% Great: 293%

SPEED RANK: 4^th / 714

43,922 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 C979)
Worst Bench: 69% Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 69% Great: 79%

SPEED RANK: 98^th / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		257 %	Hugely faster effective speed. +244%		74.8 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	327 fps	Hugely better lighting effects. +221%	102 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	435 fps	Hugely better reflection handling. +401%	86.9 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	519 fps	Hugely faster multi rendering. +523%	83.3 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	303 fps	Hugely faster NBody calculation. +320%	72.2 fps


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	392 fps	Hugely better peak lighting effects. +266%	107 fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	520 fps	Hugely better peak reflection handling. +352%	115 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	578 fps	Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +568%	86.5 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	335 fps	Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +343%	75.7 fps

Market Share

Based on 67,401,283 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.23 %	0.57 %	Hugely higher market share. +148%
Value Value For Money	60.9 %	63.7 %	+5%
User Rating UBM User Rating	58 %	90 %	Much more popular. +55%
Price Price (score)	$1,000	$278	Much cheaper. +72%


Age Newest	16 Months	Much more recent. +38%	26 Months
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	848 fps	Hugely better peak texture detail. +760%	98.6 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	502 fps	Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +639%	67.9 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	761 fps	Hugely better texture detail. +753%	89.2 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	460 fps	Hugely faster complex splatting. +613%	64.5 fps

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. ^{[Dec '22 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The RTX 3050 is built on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture. It marks the first time that ray-tracing has been available on an entry level (50-series) card. Second generation ray tracing cores can be switched on for more realistic light simulation, albeit at a hit to performance. The 3050 features 2560 CUDA cores, a boost clock frequency of 1.78 GHz, 8 GB of the latest GDDR6 memory and NVIDIA’s DLSS. DLSS technology uses the 3050’s tensor cores to scale up resolutions whilst maintaining high frame rates and without losing significant image quality. The 3050 also includes an encoder (NVENC) for sharper images and smoother capture whilst recording/streaming. The MRSP of entry models is $249 USD, however, street prices are closer to $600 USD. Early benchmarks show that the 3050 only headlines around 50% faster than AMD's 6500 XT whilst street prices for the 3050 are over 100% higher. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. AMD’s neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Experienced gamers know all too well that high average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. ^{[Jan '22 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback