Real World Speed
Performance profile from 55,994 user samples
31,704 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Worst Bench: 68% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 68% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 621
24,290 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 27% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB
Poor: 19% Great: 27%
SPEED RANK: 111th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
84.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+260%
23.5 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
483 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+309%
118 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+187%
63.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
323 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+269%
87.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
284 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+265%
77.8 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
575 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+317%
138 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+184%
67.6 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
371 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+267%
101 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
302 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+265%
82.8 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
157 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+41%
111 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+136%
52 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+65%
46 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
186 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+55%
120 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
170 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+36%
125 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,225,621 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.51 % Hugely higher market share.
+168%
0.19 %
Value
Value For Money
65 % Much better value.
+75%
37.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
115 % Much more popular.
+44%
80 %
Price
Price (score)
$309 $150 Much cheaper.
+51%
Age
Newest
25 Months Slightly more recent.
+11%
28 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
350 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+247%
101 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
239 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+176%
86.7 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
295 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+254%
83.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
227 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+185%
79.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback