Real World Speed
Performance profile from 79,697 user samples
46,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 77% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 77% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 636
33,058 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 27% Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 21% HP(103C 83E5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 21% Great: 27%
SPEED RANK: 127th / 636
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
85.6 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+256%
24 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
286 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+246%
82.6 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
183 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+190%
63.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+271%
88.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
352 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+252%
100 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+183%
67.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
372 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+268%
101 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+44%
110 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+124%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+65%
50 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
189 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+56%
121 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
198 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+60%
123 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
150 Fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+110%
72 Fps
Market Share
Based on 26,145,390 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.34 % Much higher market share.
+70%
0.2 %
Value
Value For Money
53.4 % Hugely better value.
+125%
23.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
116 % Much more popular.
+51%
77 %
Price
Price (score)
$380 $240 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
31 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
34 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
239 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+177%
86.4 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
578 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+322%
137 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
302 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+267%
82.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
223 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+183%
78.9 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
490 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+319%
117 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
288 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+272%
77.4 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $84SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback