COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
AMD
VS
Game EFps  
+30%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		236 EFps +3% 229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		78 EFps 110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+41%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		98 EFps 138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+41%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		94 EFps 127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+35%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		117 EFps 157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+34%
Effective Speed 
+26%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 346,961 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 714
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		78 % 98.3 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
Average Score 
+29%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		98.3 fps 124 fps Better lighting effects.
+26%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		105 fps 139 fps Much better reflection handling.
+32%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		88.6 fps 118 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+33%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		114 fps 140 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23%
Overclocked Score 
+25%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		109 fps 133 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+22%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		112 fps 146 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+30%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		94.1 fps 122 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+30%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		128 fps 151 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+18%
Value & Sentiment 
+123%
Market Share
Based on 67,426,706 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % 0.32 % Hugely higher market share.
+540%
Value
Value For Money 		109 % Better value.
+17% 		93.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % 58 %
Price
Price (score) 		$170 Much cheaper.
+32% 		$250
Nice To Haves 
+29%
Age
Newest 		80 Months 57 Months More recent.
+29%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		175 fps 229 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		77.6 fps 98.2 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+27%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		155 fps 205 fps Much better texture detail.
+32%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		74.5 fps 94.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 78%
Average Bench 98.3%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
92,053
254,908
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback