UserBenchmark: AMD RX 5700 vs Vega-56

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

BUY • $170

AMD

BUY • $275

BenchYourGPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	236 EFps	Slightly Better CSGO EFps. +7%	220 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	78 EFps		97 EFps	Better GTAV EFps. +24%
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	98 EFps		133 EFps	Much Better Overwatch EFps. +36%
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	94 EFps		125 EFps	Much Better PUBG EFps. +33%
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	117 EFps		143 EFps	Better Fortnite EFps. +22%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 167,971 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

92,053 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 71% Great: 85%

SPEED RANK: 93^rd / 714

75,918 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5705)
Worst Bench: 78% AMD(1002 0B36)

Poor: 78% Great: 91%

SPEED RANK: 87^th / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		78 %			85 %	Slightly faster effective speed. +9%


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	98.3 fps	107 fps	Slightly better lighting effects. +9%
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	105 fps	122 fps	Better reflection handling. +16%
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	88.6 fps	103 fps	Faster multi rendering. +16%
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	114 fps	120 fps	Slightly faster NBody calculation. +5%


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	109 fps	115 fps	Slightly better peak lighting effects. +6%
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	112 fps	136 fps	Better peak reflection handling. +21%
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	94.1 fps	114 fps	Faster peak multi rendering. +21%
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	128 fps	129 fps	+1%

Market Share

Based on 67,423,568 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.06 %	Higher market share. +20%	0.05 %
Value Value For Money	109 %	Much better value. +49%	73.2 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	58 %		68 %	More popular. +17%
Price Price (score)	$170	Much cheaper. +38%	$275


Age Newest	80 Months	57 Months	More recent. +29%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	175 fps	180 fps	+3%
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	77.6 fps	91 fps	Faster peak complex splatting. +17%
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	155 fps	164 fps	Slightly better texture detail. +6%
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	74.5 fps	80.2 fps	Slightly faster complex splatting. +8%

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. ^{[Nov '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. ^{[Nov '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback