Real World Speed
Performance profile from 675,349 user samples
32,418 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 621
642,931 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3281)
Worst Bench: 50% MSI(1462 328B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 50% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 51st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
84.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+51%
56.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
483 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+129%
211 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps Faster multi rendering.
+23%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
323 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+55%
208 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
284 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+78%
160 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
571 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+141%
237 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
162 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
370 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+65%
224 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
303 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+73%
175 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
157 fps 160 fps +2%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+21%
102 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+33%
68 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+27%
60 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
186 fps +3% 181 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+23%
101 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+45%
70 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+49%
57 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
170 fps 217 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+28%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps +5% 76 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
129 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+22%
105 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,185,054 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.52 % 4.1 % Hugely higher market share.
+688%
Value
Value For Money
65 % Better value.
+22%
53.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
115 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
103 %
Price
Price (score)
$309 $250 Cheaper.
+19%
Age
Newest
25 Months Much more recent.
+34%
38 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
345 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+43%
242 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
239 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+14%
210 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
296 fps Much better lighting effects.
+33%
222 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
228 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
195 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback