Real World Speed
Performance profile from 259,160 user samples
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 714
167,107 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% MSI(1462 3170)
Worst Bench: 53% MSI(1462 3170)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 112th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78 % Much faster effective speed.
+32%
59.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.3 fps Much better lighting effects.
+33%
73.7 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
105 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
86.4 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
88.6 fps Faster multi rendering.
+17%
75.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
114 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+57%
72.8 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
109 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+30%
83.9 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
112 fps 113 fps +1%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
94.1 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
80.6 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
128 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+58%
80.9 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 Fps 183 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+16%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+11%
105 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+26%
70 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+35%
61 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
189 Fps 191 Fps +1%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
123 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+18%
104 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
108 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+46%
74 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
87 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+44%
60 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
198 Fps 207 Fps +5%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
150 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+11%
136 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
79 Fps +5% 75 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+17%
111 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,424,888 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % 0.19 % Hugely higher market share.
+217%
Value
Value For Money
109 % Hugely better value.
+287%
28.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 66 % More popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+66%
$500
Age
Newest
80 Months Much more recent.
+30%
115 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
175 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+111%
83 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.6 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
72.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
155 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+107%
74.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.5 fps Faster complex splatting.
+14%
65.3 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 980 is the new top end Maxwell based Nvidia GPU. The Maxwell architecture offers significantly higher clock for clock performance when compared to Kepler based cards from the previous generation. Comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 970 shows that the 970 only lags by around 17% in terms of performance but it's priced nearly 40% lower making the GTX 970 far better value for money card. Even though the GTX 970 beats the 980 in terms of value, the 980 still destroys previous generation cards. Comparing the GTX 980 and 780 Ti shows that the Newer 980 offers around 14% better performance at a 25% price discount. Nvidia have changed the price/performance landscape with their new Maxwell architecture and now pose a serious threat to AMDs high end GPU market share. The new GTX 980/970 cards replace the now discontinued GTX 780 Ti, 780 and 770. [Sep '14 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback