Real World Speed
Performance profile from 61,693 user samples
31,278 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 137% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 91% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 91% Great: 137%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 621
30,415 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 126% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 85% Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 85% Great: 126%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
122 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
111 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
534 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+12%
476 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
187 fps +3% 182 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
367 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+15%
318 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
289 fps +2% 282 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
633 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+11%
572 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
197 fps +4% 190 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
428 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+17%
367 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
309 fps +3% 301 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
223 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+43%
156 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps +1% 121 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+13%
92 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+5%
84 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
191 fps +5% 183 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
128 fps +2% 125 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 108 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps +2% 89 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+7%
79 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps 130 fps +3%
Market Share
Based on 19,301,457 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.41 % 0.66 % Much higher market share.
+61%
Value
Value For Money
72.2 % 87.4 % Better value.
+21%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % 115 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $300 Cheaper.
+25%
Age
Newest
24 Months 24 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
374 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
345 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
246 fps +3% 239 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
321 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+11%
289 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
230 fps +2% 225 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback