Real World Speed
Performance profile from 474,458 user samples
15,185 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 134% Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 73% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 599
459,273 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Gigabyte(1458 3716)
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 371A)
Poor: 58% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 599
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
119 % Much faster effective speed.
+69%
70.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
524 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+146%
213 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
185 fps Faster multi rendering.
+25%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
365 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+76%
207 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
289 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+81%
160 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
628 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+162%
240 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
162 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
418 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+84%
227 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
305 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+71%
178 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
219 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+36%
161 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+44%
69 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+41%
61 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
149 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+47%
101 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+25%
101 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+45%
58 fps
Market Share
Based on 13,915,064 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.47 % 6 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,177%
Value
Value For Money
84.1 % 91.4 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
79 % 170 % Hugely more popular.
+115%
Price
Price (score)
$620 $250 Much cheaper.
+60%
Age
Newest
17 Months Much more recent.
+43%
30 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
368 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+50%
246 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
243 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+15%
212 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
303 fps Much better lighting effects.
+38%
219 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
229 fps Better reflection handling.
+18%
194 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $89
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $700Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback