Real World Speed
Performance profile from 690,464 user samples
27,023 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 137% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 73% Great: 137%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 613
663,441 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% MSI(1462 3302)
Worst Bench: 82% EVGA(3842 5171) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 82% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
120 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
97.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
529 fps Much better texture detail.
+74%
304 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
186 fps 199 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
364 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
284 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
288 fps Faster complex splatting.
+30%
222 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
640 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+83%
350 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
197 fps 214 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
424 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+34%
316 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
310 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+27%
244 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
229 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+15%
199 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+13%
122 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+30%
80 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+16%
78 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
191 fps 213 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+12%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
128 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+12%
115 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps +3% 95 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+10%
82 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 128 fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 17,766,780 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % 4.27 % Hugely higher market share.
+691%
Value
Value For Money
113 % Slightly better value.
+9%
104 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
81 % 195 % Hugely more popular.
+141%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $335 Cheaper.
+16%
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+39%
36 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
368 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
345 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
245 fps 311 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
310 fps +3% 301 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
229 fps 282 fps Better reflection handling.
+23%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $101
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback